In the election campaign Link to Zimella [ http://www.zimella.com/programma_elettorale.html ] promised:
" Reducing the municipal income tax levied on salaries, personal income and pensions , and rationalization and restatement fees and local taxes ( waste, canteen and school transport, etc.). moderating as the municipal tax burden and to ensure greater social equity, with particular attention to large families with disabilities and / or dependent elderly ".
Today we open a series of chapters that will be analyzed together with the help of feedback.
The tax on waste, for citizenship, has increased . We do concrete examples in the comments and then evaluate the change in%.
I know that the law was necessary for the rationalization of waste matter. Really well done to the report of the municipal technicians.
I could come to understand that the increase was necessary because the rates, with the former mayor, were required to fall or have not been revised in close elections. I do not seem a serious thing ... although I suppose that Lunardi also could have used this tool as a self-promotion. But since the result would say that was not enough.
But beware: the rise and there is concrete.
I oreover come reports of increases in the municipal income tax: confirmed? In fact I believe that the rate of 0.8% has been confirmed ... pity that it is the exact double of that of Arcola, which also sees a League administration.
Because the league has promised above and then not kept?
I have my own idea and will set out in the discussion that follows, I hope lively and civil, in the comments.
Thanks. AG
