www.beppegrillo.it AGREEMENT TO THE LEFT THE CHAMBER
The Union won, after some sober spumantino Romano Prodi ask our employees to quickly get to work tomorrow morning starting from incinerators. Prodi
ride, ride ... "Dear Prime Minister Romano Prodi, the production of energy through waste incineration, which is unique and challenged in Europe, is now heavily subsidized by the state, because of improper benefits from so-called contribution Cip 6, sources allocated to "energy" we pay the electricity bill: Cip6 without the production of energy from waste does not present any economic advantage compared to the same sources rinnovabili.La European Commission, which she chaired in 2003 with the Commissioner EU Commissioner for Transport and Energy, Loyola De Palacio, in response to a question of 'MEP Monica Frassoni, on 11/20/2003 (response E-2935/03IT) reiterated the EU's firm no to the extension of the system of European subsidies for the development of renewable energy renewable, provided for in Directive 2001/77, the incineration of the non-biodegradable waste. These statements in the text of its Energy Commissioner 2003: "The Commission confirms that, as defined in Article 2, letter b) of Directive 2001/77/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 27 September 2001 on the promotion of electricity produced from renewable energy sources in the internal electricity market, the non-biodegradable waste can not be considered a renewable energy source. "Bocconi University study in 2005 showed that the cost of 1 MWh produced by a hydroelectric plant medium is equal to 66 € down to 63 if wind is produced, increases to 121 if produced from biomass and arrives at 280 in the case of photovoltaics. The incineration of municipal solid waste with "recovery energy, without considering the cost of management and treatment of waste and damage to human health caused by the nanoparticles, before they get to the incinerator, is of 228 € MWh.Questo means that if the Cip6, we pay our bills Enel , go to truly renewable sources in Italy would cost to go on the calendar, not the incinerators! If the state contribution would be allocated to truly renewable sources and waste, electricity production from the so-called RDF (refuse derived fuel) and called via Incinerators improperly and only in Italy "solid waste incinerators" would have no economic benefit. Neither the city nor the companies that choose to produce energy through this system or to dispose of waste by incineration. In addition, incinerators, especially the younger generation, as demonstrated by the studies of Dr. Stefano Montanari and Dr. Antonietta Gatti, produce dangerous inorganic nanoparticles (Pm 2.5 to Pm 0, 01) entering the blood, and there are deposited in the organs of human body and cause serious diseases, among them cancer. These are the so-called nanopatologie.Queste nanopowders are created by the high temperatures that are generated. A story seen even at the plant for Enel fuel oil Porto Tolle (where Tato, Scaroni and Enel were sentenced to pay three million euro), including veterans of the War in Kosovo and Iraq (the so-called "Gulf War Syndrome" caused by depleted uranium shells or tungsten), the collapse of the Twin Towers in New York and in industrial areas. Some Particulate Filters are strongly suspected of producing dangerous nanoparticelle.Come his government's first act then we ask:
- comply with those European and immediately abolish funding for incineration of waste as they are not renewable energy source. As in other European countries, the incineration of waste should be taxed, and we say, forbidden-abolish the "Enabling Act" Environment of the Berlusconi government, which provides, inter alia, an incinerator in each province over the elimination of many constraints to protect the environment health-and then the decisive point, to manage the full cycle of waste management, to: source reduction, tax those who produce more packaging and encourage those who are focusing on recycling and waste reduction, recycling mandatory throughout Italy as in Germany and for the treatment of residual use modern biological treatment system "cold", ie without incineration already experienced in other European cities and Sydney, Australia, in addition to not produce nanopowders cost about 75% less than incineration, law to recognize the dangers of nanoparticles (less than 2.5 Pm to 0.01 Pm) as already a number of scholars from across Europe are asking Commission and Parliament Europeo.Vogliamo change. She has, for now, our confidence. "
and blogger Beppe Grillo